model muscle lever system Search Results


transcranial magnetic stimulation  (Welcony)
97
Welcony transcranial magnetic stimulation
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, supplied by Welcony, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/transcranial magnetic stimulation/product/Welcony
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transcranial magnetic stimulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
thigh muscle  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific thigh muscle
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Thigh Muscle, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/thigh muscle/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
thigh muscle - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
dual model muscle lever system  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific dual model muscle lever system
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Dual Model Muscle Lever System, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dual model muscle lever system/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual model muscle lever system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
305c 5n dual mode muscle lever system  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific 305c 5n dual mode muscle lever system
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
305c 5n Dual Mode Muscle Lever System, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/305c 5n dual mode muscle lever system/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
305c 5n dual mode muscle lever system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
muscle force ex vivo  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific muscle force ex vivo
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Muscle Force Ex Vivo, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/muscle force ex vivo/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
muscle force ex vivo - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
two-level surrogate muscle-tendon geometric model  (OpenSim Ltd)
90
OpenSim Ltd two-level surrogate muscle-tendon geometric model
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Two Level Surrogate Muscle Tendon Geometric Model, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/two-level surrogate muscle-tendon geometric model/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
two-level surrogate muscle-tendon geometric model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
krebs ringer solution  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific krebs ringer solution
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Krebs Ringer Solution, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/krebs ringer solution/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
krebs ringer solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
force transducer  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific force transducer
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Force Transducer, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/force transducer/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
force transducer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
temperature controlled organ bath  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific temperature controlled organ bath
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Temperature Controlled Organ Bath, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/temperature controlled organ bath/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
temperature controlled organ bath - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
opensim muscle-tendon lengths  (OpenSim Ltd)
90
OpenSim Ltd opensim muscle-tendon lengths
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Opensim Muscle Tendon Lengths, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/opensim muscle-tendon lengths/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
opensim muscle-tendon lengths - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
force controlled indenter  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific force controlled indenter
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Force Controlled Indenter, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/force controlled indenter/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
force controlled indenter - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
model 1300a dual mode muscle lever system  (Aurora Scientific)
86
Aurora Scientific model 1300a dual mode muscle lever system
Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to <t>transcranial</t> magnetic <t>stimulation.</t> Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in <t>PCL-F3.NT3</t> group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
Model 1300a Dual Mode Muscle Lever System, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/model 1300a dual mode muscle lever system/product/Aurora Scientific
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
model 1300a dual mode muscle lever system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in PCL-F3.NT3 group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.

Journal: Cell Transplantation

Article Title: Combination of Multifaceted Strategies to Maximize the Therapeutic Benefits of Neural Stem Cell Transplantation for Spinal Cord Repair

doi: 10.3727/096368910x557155

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at 8 weeks post-SCI in both ipsilateral and contra- lateral gastrocnemius muscles in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation over the vertex at intensities of 80–100 A/µs. (A, B) Representative MEP recordings of ipsilateral (A) and contralat- eral (B) hindlimbs. The MEP responses disappeared in both hindlimbs after injury. Significant MEP recovery was observed only in PCL-F3.NT3 group in the contralateral side. (C, D) Quantita- tion graphs of MEP amplitudes in ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) hindlimbs. *p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. N = 4, 8, 7, 9, and 9 for sham, CTL, PCL, PCL-F3, and PCL-F3.NT3 groups, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.

Article Snippet: After all the behavioral tests had ELISA and Western Blot Analysis been completed (at 8 weeks post-SCI), transcranial magnetic stimulation (Magstim model 2002, Magstim, Wales,The levels of NT3 in culture medium were measured using a human NT3 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minne- UK) was delivered around the vertex of animals anes- thetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg).

Techniques: Muscles